Monday, June 15, 2015

Module 1 - The Next Generation of Distance Education


The past, like the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities.  ~ Stephen Hawking

Module 1 – The Next Generation of Distance Education

            The Internet provides people with instant access to volumes of information and knowledge.   Distance education presents communities and organizations with an alternate way to train and educate their citizens and employees.  The following is a discussion that explores Moller, Foshay, Huett, & Coleman’s (2008a; 2008b) and Simonson (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008a; Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b) ideas of how distance education must evolve in order to be a successful endeavor.

Convenient & Economical Alternative

            Distance education allows organizations and institutions easy access to education.  Students and instructors can complete and grade assignments at their convenience allowing people to adjust their schedules and manage their time for school (Moller et al., 2008a; Moller et al., 2008b).  Moreover, students and instructors can complete course work or teach from home or other locations without driving to school (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b).   Not having to go to a school building is handy when one must go away for a family or work event.
            Moreover, distance education saves money (Moller et al., 2008a).  Institutions do not have the overhead costs associated with maintaining classrooms and buildings (Moller et al., 2008a).  Additionally, students and teachers save time and gas money because there is no need to drive to school (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b).  Furthermore, students with children do not need daycare while they are in class, which also saves a lot of money.  Instead, students can complete assignments when their children are sleeping or watching television.
            Finally, distance learning provides education to students that may not otherwise have the opportunity to go to school (Huett et al., 2008; Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b).   For example, some students live in rural areas where the closest college or schools are hours away.   As a result, travel expenses or time may prevent a person from going to school.  Also, if a person cannot go to school due to an illness of a family member or themselves, e-learning provides an alternative way to get an education (Huett et al., 2008).          

The Future of Distance Education

1.  Distance education will supplement face-to-face courses (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008a).

In the future, distance learning will complement more face-to-face courses.  Having a distance education component to a sit-down class allows students to use technology (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b).  Furthermore, the asynchronous nature of discussion boards, encourage students to think about the class discussions and lectures after school (Moller et al., 2008a; Moller et al., 2008b).  Students must take the time to reflect on the course material before making comments promoting critical thinking skills.

2.  Enrollment in distance education programs will increase as more people go to college to finish or earn degrees, particularly at the graduate level (Moller et al., 2008b).

Specifically, many of the new jobs of the future will require advanced degrees.  For example, the need for people trained in the healthcare industry is predicted to add the most jobs to the US market from 2012 – 2022 (U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2013).  Most of these jobs require advanced training or degrees to gain employment (U.S. BLS, 2013).

3.  Distance education is not a substitute for face-to-face institutions (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008a).

There will be a need for brick and mortar schools to teach students going for degrees in science, technical trades, and the medical field.  On the job training and laboratory, skills are needed to for these degrees (U.S. BLS, 2013).  The only way to gain experience is through internships or going to a real laboratory with materials and equipment to practice the skills needed for the job.

My Opinion

            I agree with Dr. Simonson that distance education is not a replacement for face-to-face education and brick, and motor institutions are not leaving anytime soon (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b).  As a result, he believes that distance learning designers should strive to make learning outcomes and the knowledge gained from a course "equivalent" to the in-person counterpart (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b; Moller et al., 2008b).  I think for this to occur, educators need to determine the best teaching practices for a particular subject. 
Depending upon the subject and the content will dictate whether a course can be completely or partially taught in-person or online (Moller et al., 2008a; Moller et al., 2008b; Huett et al., 2008).  For example, I taught chemistry at a rural high school.  One of my students attended the alternate high school after getting into trouble at school.  She was enrolled in a distance education chemistry course.  She watched lessons and completed assignments by herself.  When her punishment ended, she returned to school and my chemistry class.  She was slightly ahead of my class; however, she did not understand chemistry.  She could not complete problems or answer questions regarding basic chemistry concepts that were covered in the first quarter. 
Chemistry is a course that builds upon each idea throughout the year.  Students must understand a topic to move forward to the next concept to successfully apply their knowledge.  Perhaps if my student had more tutoring or mentoring throughout her virtual chemistry class, she would have performed better throughout the school year.  Also, research suggests that distance education may not benefit all types of learners and should not be the alternate method of instruction for everyone (Huett et al., 2008).
            In my opinion, certain courses such as science, technical trades, and medical courses need face-to-face time, especially during the laboratories.  Virtual or simulated labs are great for practice and learning how to use equipment; however, they are vastly different than doing a real lab.  In the virtual world, people do not have the opportunity to pick up equipment with their hands and learn the skills needed to conduct experiments or complete tasks.  
Furthermore, Moller et al. (2008a; 2008b), Huett et al. (2008), and Laureate Education, Inc. (2008b) propose that distance education must be developed properly to be effective and benefit students.  Quality e-learning requires trained personnel or instructional designers that are knowledgeable on the best teaching techniques and technologies for a specific subject and that also requires time (Moller et al., 2008a; Moller et al., 2008b; Huett et al., 2008; & Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b). I think that my chemistry student would have benefited from these principles as well as future students requiring alternate methods of instruction; otherwise, society will fail to provide a proper education for everyone.
In conclusion, distance education is an affordable, convenient, alternate method of delivery for training instruction.  Universities and organizations must train their faculty and staff on the proper teaching techniques for distance education because they are not the same (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008b; Moller et al., 2008b).  If people are aware and embrace the differences between face-to-face and virtual learning, distance education can be a successful endeavor for everyone.

References:

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Coleman, C.  (2008).  The evolution of distance education:  Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web:  Part 3:  K – 12. TechTrends, 52(5), 63 – 67.

Laureate Education, Inc.  (2008a).  Principles of distance education:  Distance education:  The net generation.  Baltimore, MD:  Author.

Laureate Education, Inc.  (2008b).  Principles of distance education:  Equivalency theory.  Baltimore, MD:  Author.

Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J.  (2008a).  The evolution of distance education:  Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web: Part 1:  Training and development. TechTrends, 52(3), 70 – 75.

Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J.  (2008b).  The evolution of distance education:  Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web:  Part 2:  Higher education.  TechTrends, 52(4), 66 – 70.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  (2013, December 19).  Economic news release:  Employment projections:  2012 – 2022 summary.  Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.nr0.htm